Essays

July 2, 2026

Momentum: Finding Where You Fit

Founder-business fit is not where the money is. It is where you can take 100 actions fastest. The deep-dive on belief as fuel, the glamorous-space trap, and why your desires are far more editable than you think.

This essay has an interactive module: Momentum: finding where you fit. Run it →

This is the reading version of the Momentum: Finding Where You Fit module. The module is fast and interactive. This is the slow, deep version, for when you want to actually sit with the idea.

The question everyone gets wrong

Most people pick a business by asking one question: where is the money? It feels rational. It is also how a lot of smart, hardworking people end up stuck for a year going nowhere.

The problem is not that the question is false. Money is real. The problem is sequencing. "Where is the money" quietly assumes the payout is reachable by anyone who shows up. It is not. Payouts get collected by people who already hold leverage in that space: skill, network, reputation, capital. Walk in with none of those and the money you can see is not money you can touch. It is a photograph of someone else's dinner.

So the real first question is different, and it is the whole point of this essay: not "where is the money," but "where can I move fastest?" Done beats perfect. And momentum beats both.

The coach who chased the money

A fitness coach I know is the cleanest case study of this I have ever seen. Disciplined, lives and breathes fitness, gets real results for his clients. Then he does the math: a Dubai real-estate broker makes far more. The spreadsheet is not wrong; commissions on 2 crore flats dwarf coaching retainers. So he switches.

For an entire year, he cannot close a single deal.

Watch how tempting the wrong diagnoses are. Better scripts? Technique transfers better than people think, and he was already a closer; a new script cannot fix a seller who does not want to dial. A smarter niche inside real estate, maybe homes for gym owners? Clever, and still cosmetic: a niche lowers competition, it does not manufacture conviction in a product he does not care about. Same empty engine, smaller track. A warmer referral network? Referrals are the output of volume, and volume is exactly what never happened. The thin network was a symptom, not the blocker.

The actual blocker: he did not believe in what he was selling, or in himself as the person selling it in that space. Belief is the fuel for action. To take a hundred sales actions you need near-infinite belief in the product and in yourself in that lane. He had none there, so the actions never fired, no matter how good the scripts. No belief, no momentum, no deals.

Here is the part that seals it. The moment he went back to fitness, the thing he swears by, results came fast. He started making money way sooner. Less money than the Dubai dream promised on paper, sure. But real money, actually moving, because the actions finally flowed. A smaller number that compounds beats a bigger number that never starts. The richer option on paper was the worst decision in practice.

Momentum, measured by one brutal metric

The model, plainly: founder-business fit is not where the money is. Fit is where your momentum is highest, measured by one brutal metric: how fast can you take 100 actions here?

Why actions, specifically? Because every action does three jobs at once. It is a unit of learning: each pitch teaches you the market faster than any report could. It is a lottery ticket: luck finds people in motion, and a hundred attempts is a hundred chances for something to break your way. And it is a node in a network: every shipped thing leaves behind a person who now knows you exist. Skill, luck, and network are the ingredients of leverage, and raw volume feeds all three at once. Action is the leverage machine. It is also the only input fully in your control on day one. You cannot will a network into existence. You can absolutely send a hundred emails.

Naval Ravikant says: "Play long-term games with long-term people. All returns in life come from compound interest." I take that seriously, and the part people miss is that compounding needs a starting velocity. A long-term game you never start playing compounds nothing. The space where you can take 100 actions fastest is where your compounding begins this month instead of someday.

But crowds signal money, right?

Let me steelman the other side, because it deserves it.

Objection one: hot spaces are hot because the money is proven, so why walk away? Answer: crowds do signal money, for the people already holding leverage there. With no edge yet, the hot space is where you stall politely while funded players sprint past you. The carve-a-niche-once-inside move is real, but it needs momentum you have not built yet.

Objection two: surely low competition is the top marker of a good market, so pick the emptiest room. True later, wrong first. Low competition matters when you are aiming momentum you already have. If you cannot get yourself to move, an empty room just means you lose slowly in private. Both objections make the same mistake: they evaluate the track before checking whether the engine runs.

The glamorous-space trap

Now the counterintuitive part. Suppose you are genuinely passionate about a glamorous, attractive space. You love it, you think about it constantly. Common sense says passion plus a hot market is the dream combination for momentum.

Usually, it chokes it.

When you are too passionate and too invested, every single action feels precious. You polish instead of shipping. You hesitate. You take feedback personally, because the work is not just work, it is you. And the action count quietly collapses. Momentum dies of preciousness. This is one of the most common ways founder-business fit silently breaks: the space you love most can be the exact space where you take the fewest actions. The glamour adds competition on the outside while the passion adds weight on the inside, both squeezing the same choke point: your action count. They do not cancel out. They stack.

Is passion ever fuel? Sometimes, genuinely. Loving the work can be what makes a brutal action count sustainable. There is a niche hidden inside every glamorous space, and if you can still fire off 100 actions there, that is genuinely commendable and you might just make it. The trap is not passion itself. It is assuming passion guarantees volume, when for most people it quietly taxes it.

The founder who outran the trap

The counter-example: another founder I know runs events. Events are an emotional, attractive space, exactly the territory where passion should choke momentum. He started out earning nothing. He went from zero to 3 to 6 lakhs a month.

What carried him was not a premium slice of the market; his pricing is ordinary. It was not emotional detachment either; he never ran it like a boring mechanical business. What carried him was a huge action count. He runs a lot of events, each event throws off references, and the references become more events. Momentum compounding on itself, in a space that should have swallowed him. The emotion never got a veto, because the momentum was simply too strong to interrupt. Money is no longer a problem for him.

So the second-order lesson: glamour is survivable, low action count is not. If your volume is high enough, it outruns passion's downsides without you having to kill the passion.

The catch: your desires are editable

So far this sounds fixed. You either have momentum in a space or you do not. The coach did not have it in real estate; he had it in fitness. Case closed. Except your inner music is not actually fixed, and this is where the whole model gets a second gear.

Say you feel zero pull toward some unglamorous, boring niche. No inner music at all. Standard advice says follow your passion, so avoid it. But is that lack of interest a permanent fact about you? No. Spend real time in the unglamorous niche and a genuine pull can appear, not faked, not forced. And the mirror image is just as true: look hard at a current passion and you may find you absorbed it from the people around you.

There is a name for this pattern: memetic desire. Most of your desires are caught, not chosen, picked up from the people and signals surrounding you. What feels like a core pull is usually a long-running input diet. Once you see this clearly, you get two powers. One, you can deliberately manipulate yourself into genuinely liking a space you wrote off, by changing your exposure. Two, you can catch a current passion in the act and realise it was never really yours.

Personally, I feel manipulated by my own memetics, and that is exactly why I am comfortable not chasing what is glamorous. Use the trick on purpose: point your inner music at the space where your momentum is highest. Naval Ravikant has a line that fits here too: "Specific knowledge is found by pursuing your genuine curiosity and passion rather than whatever is hot right now." The subtlety is that genuine curiosity is partly cultivated. Where you point your attention today shapes what feels genuine next year.

Now aim the engine at a good road

Momentum without direction just tires you out faster. Once you know where your momentum is highest, aim it well. According to me, two things matter most: gravitate toward a good market, and bring a good offer into it.

A good market looks like this: the customer is in real pain, they are easy to target, they can actually pay, the market is growing, and, most importantly, competition is low. You usually get there by niching down, segmenting a big market until all of those become true. My agency turned a corner when I narrowed to a specific kind of surgeon. One inch wide, one mile deep. Notice what this does not require: a brilliant idea. An existing service plus a sharp segment is enough. Less is more.

A good offer is about perceived value. A simple way to think about it: dream outcome times perceived likelihood of achievement, divided by the time, money, and effort it costs the client. Raise the top, shrink the bottom. Proof of work raises perceived likelihood, which is what lets you raise your price. Bring an offer like that into a low-competition niche and you become the undeniable option: you charge more, win more, and operate with leverage.

If you are a first-gen founder with no capital cushion, go services first, always. Products are J-curve businesses: heavy cash up front, long dips, seasoned players winning. Services flip that: no upfront capital, low risk, and clients frequently pay in advance, which is exactly the cushion you lack. Aim high-ticket and low volume: about 12 guaranteed transactions in year one, 5 to 6 wealthy clients, each paying you enough for a month and a bit. Keep time, your scarcest denominator, low. Even real estate, technically a product, really runs as a service: the operation is sales.

One more thing about niching: people imagine it as a clever decision made in advance. It is not. Your first idea probably sucks, and that is fine. Real niches get shaped by your vision plus feedback from your first customers. Be willing to be exploited early: learn from 100 projects, then find the overlap between what you enjoy, who pays well, and who is best to work with. When you get exploited, you are not really losing money. You are earning leverage. The gift is that you get to choose who exploits you. Doing thoughtfully is the best form of thinking; perspective comes from action, not the armchair.

How to actually run this

Here is the exercise. Stop reading and do it.

List the 3 to 4 spaces or niches you could realistically work in right now. For each one, ignore the money completely and answer one question honestly: how fast could I take 100 actions here this month, calls, pitches, projects, posts, without flinching? Score each space 1 to 10 on belief, and 1 to 10 on raw action speed. The highest combined score is your real fit, not the one with the biggest number on paper.

Two practical notes. First, define an action tightly: a call made, a pitch sent, a thing shipped. Planning is not an action. Second, if two spaces tie, ask which one your exposure could move you toward on purpose. That is your memetic lever, and it breaks the tie better than any spreadsheet.

Then pick the top one and take 10 actions in it this week. Not next month. This week. If the count stalls, diagnose belief before you diagnose tactics, because the coach's year in Dubai was never a scripts problem.

The quiet payoff of choosing this way is that the original question answers itself. Find your highest-momentum space, feed it a good market and a good offer, and the money tends to follow. Momentum is built, not found.

Want the fast, interactive version instead? Run the Momentum: Finding Where You Fit module, or explore the whole codex.